If I were to make changes to the book I am reading, it would be the imlicit history involved; I would make it more explicit! I would possibly even include an introduction to the book that paraphrases the preeminent history that the author uses to entrall the reader. I will have to say, however, that the plethora of historical references has certainly instilled cupidity for more historical knowledge; I have spend redundant amounts of time enhancing my knowledge by reading scintillating accounts of the Jacobite Rebellions (events that I would otherwise know nothing about!) SO...I guess the author's intent was not so deleterious after all!
One thing i would change about my story is the slow pacing. The author is very detailed but most of the thigns she descibed are impicit to me and i don't need the redundent descrpitions. I also don't like uncle charles, it seems prosaic and i don't think he considereds other feelings. Like he got uo and moved half way around the world and took aurelia with him without even considering her perspective. I feel that he is being sactimonious about his mission trip, and when he presents aurelia is he is very ostentatious
If I had the opportunity to change my book, I would definately change it! I am still reading Lock and Key by Sarah Dessen. As of right now, I am beginning to loose interest in reading this because it is so prosaic. I wish I was experiencing cupidity so I could actually have the motivation to continue reading the novel. It's not nesecessarily boring, but there are definately places in the novel where the author could have made it a little more exciting. She tends to write in a sanctimonious style in this novel and it gets old fast. I would make the main character, Ruby, a little more scintillating and winsome so more action could happen in the story. If she would just gain these characteristics, she would have the ability to enthrall her peers and become more open in her everyday life.
If I could change my book, i would bring Macy's dad back to life. I would include an introduction or something that paraphrased the book. This way the author could enthrall you before even rading the book. I would also try to make the book less redundant. Some parts of the book are prosaic and do not get my interest. I would also make Macy's boyfriend more winsome and caring. All he cares about is his school work. I would give him cupidity so that he wants his own girlfriend. Over though, I like the book a lot and am enjoying it quite well!
Ok so my book is very slow moving. I would definantly change that. I would enhance the pace of the book ramatically. I have been reading for a while now and just realized my book changes points of view. Although my book is preeminent, I would still change it. The book is prosaic. I wish it was scintillating. The story should change more rapidly. The bus accident wasn't very deleterious. At the very beginnning it sounded a;most destructive. Myabe i just have to go farther into the book to figure out what really happenend. Wll that is about all I would change in my book. I don't think i'm far enough to really tell what to change yet.
If I could I would change the book I am reading a little. I would make the book so it is not as prosaic. Sometimes it is hard to understand because it is written in poems. Some of the poems are redundant. There are many things that are repeated and excess things I don't think I really need to know. I would also enhance the poems so that I would know who was writing them. I also would change all the paragon girls. Some of the poems create a caricature in my mind of what they look like. Although, they most likely don't look like the way I pictured them.
If I was going to make changes in my book the first change I would make is to enhance the reader's knowledge of the time the book took place. It is hard to sat when the events are occuring. Also I would change some of the paraphrasing. I think the author could go into better detail. The author never extenuates the beatings the dogs take so I think it could be less gruesome at times. I don't like that the author makes averyone out to be deletorious and mean. I think maybe one person could be nice to these dogs. The auhtor doesn't mske any of the characters very winsome, sometimes you can't even understand what the character is saying. I really like the theme of my book but i think it could be written more open.
If I had a chance to enhance my book I would start the book at an earlier place. I would give a little more detail as to how Harry's parents were killed. You could paraphrase parts of it but still give more detail to it. I would also make Harry’s parents seem more important. They really didn’t get into what kind of people they were so maybe I would give them more character. Are they preeminent characters or more prosaic characters? What I would also change was I would have written more on Harry’s relatives waking up to see him on the front step. They said very little about the morning they found him. If I was the author I might have written more redundantly on this part in the story. I think she could have made this part more detailed.
Amanda C I would change a small bit in the book I'm reading but not a whole lot because then it would loose its effect. I would make the Emmy charictor less like a paragon. I would paraphrase some of the information surronded by the redundant words so it'd make more sence. I would also enhance the importance and the apperance of Emmy in the book. I think I would even make Otis less prosaic.
If I could make a change to the book I am reading, I would give Lee a higher self-esteem. She is constantly worried that people our judging her every move. She might not be winsome, she is actually quite prosaic. I really do not think anyone cares what she does. She is very redundant when it somes to her crush Cross, she is constantly trting to impress him. She is full of cupidity as well. She does not think that she can be popular because she is ugly and poor, so she ditches her best friend to room with a better looking girl. She sort of reminds me of Holden; her cynicism is her preeminent feature. She has an opinion on everyone.
If I could change my book, I would probably change how much the character Becky is in it. She isn't in it as much as she is in the movie. In the movie, Becky and Sara are contiguous throughout the entire thing. I would also change how deleterious Miss Minchin is. She is described as this horrible person, but hasn't done anything that terrible yet. I guess the book wants you to be implicit! Something I would have changed earlier in my book would have to be how ostentatious Sara was with her riches. In the movie, she was not like this at all. The girls all viewed her as a paragon and preeminent girl. There should be a redundant explanation of Sara's new life as well. Other than the few things just discussed, I am really enjoying this book. When I am done I will watcht eh movie to compare the many differences i have already found!
I'm reading the book Dirty Liar. I like how vividly he describes many of the items and feelings. It's enthralling because of how much detail he puts into it. If I could change the book, I'd make him quit his deleterious behavior of doing drugs. I find the writing style very similar to a lot of stories I read on the internet, so it almost feels redundant because of that. The main character's very honest to himself and in a way others around him, though. There's nothing sanctimonious about him. His honesty definantly enhances the story.
Making my character care about his men and situation he is in is what i would do to my book. I think that would enhance my book much better. I would also give him cupidity for something other than his distant love for someone, it has actually gotten pretty annoying. His out of mind behaviour has proved deleterious to the men in his squad, although he seems implicit to his actions. I will keep an incisive eye to whether he will change, eversince im not far in the book.
I didn't have time to read The Book Theif during class today, so when I went home, I finished Forever in Blue, the fourth and final Traveling Pants book. Although I have read all these books many times before, I continue to have great cupidity to read them. I never find them to be prosaic snd they enthrall the reader with their details, wit, and emotional pull. I guess I would change how easily Lena took Kostos back. They say that they are meant for each other and will never love anyone else, but I still think there could have been someone else out there for Lena. I feel like their love was implicit, and I think that at least, instead of changing that they got back together, the explanation of their situation could have been enhanced.
I am reading Lolita by: Vladimir Nabokov. If I were to change my book I would have not let Humbert have a relationship with Annabel. Ever since Annabel, winsome little girls or "nymphets" would enthrall Humbert's interest. The book is really well written but in the perspective of a mind who wished to be absolved for his cupidity for nymphets but cannot help to but to feel the way that he does. Humbert's character seems to be implicit that he is disturbed in some way but you still can't help reading what he has to say because it's so interesting yet controversial. I really like it so far.
If I could change anything about my book it would probably be making it a faster pace. I am reading Lovely Bones and it is about a girl in heaven who was murdered by a deleterious man. I like how the book is from the point of view of the girl in heaven named Susie. It is enthralling! It is definitely not a prosaic book. I also do not like how the author uses redundant details. It is nice that the story is descriptive, but it is pretty slow paced because of all the details she throws in. I am going to keep reading it though because my mom says it is a preeminent book.
I'm not that far into the book "The Party Room" right now but I would change some things about it. So far the book has been sort of cheesy and seems very overdone and redundant. It is such a common story that it makes it kind out prosaic. I'm really hoping that there ends up being something preeminent happening for a surprise. The only events that have occured so far is that the two main girls- Sam and Kirsten, are at the party room drinking, popping pills, gossipping, and dancing contiguously in large groups like at a club. Then at the end of the chapter Sam starts screaming for help that someone is hurting her but I don't know what happened yet. I'm sure that it is something very deleterious. I'll have to keep reading and see if this book is interesting enough to keep reading.
I really don't want to cange anything in my book. It's not redundant, the previous book is paraphrased at the beginning, and the characters are very winsome also. This book just gives me more Cupidity for the third book in the series. The main character Eragon has a lot of preemiment features also.
Even though I have not read far enough into my book to really know any characters, if I were to make and insicive change to the novel I would change the introduction. To me, the first chapter of the novel was prosaic. I would make the introduction captivate the readers more than it did. I would change the old dog leaving into something along the lines of the narrator and him becoming contiguous in some way, maybe by living with eachother. I would also make the descriptions of the dog and his effect on the narrator less redundant. I do believe the author wrote the beginning in this way to some how enhance the rest of the story, but I'll have to read on to know for sure.
As we all know, I'm not a huge fan of the plot of Breaking Dawn, and I think it would enhance the series if the book was written with different ideas. Plus, I think incorporating the Volturi again could have been a good thing, but so far the arrival seems to be too deleterious. Their law enforcement comes with no trial. All they need is a quick accusation or misunderstanding and the Volturi come storming in, killing mercilessly without a second thought? Seems awfully old fashioned for such an established group of vampires. I hate to say it, but the wait for their arrival is also starting to become redundant and prosaic. So, sorry everyone that I'm bashing the book again, but after the other three preeminent books, this one has really disappointed me.
If I were to make changes to the book I was reading I would change only a few details. The book is already scintillating and you can relly feel for the characters because they are winsome but the politics make some parts prosaic. The main character hardly developes and spends most of his time exchaging gossip. No major event happens in the book but more mysteries keep arrising making it even more suspenceful. The worst part though is the fact the sequal is not out yet. The series has enthralled me and I can't wait to read the ending! Some parts I would have to describe as redundant but overall the book Brisingr is excellant.
Christa, when a book becomes redundant it begins to lose favor in my eyes. Hopefully you can break through into the story more to get better reading. Often times when a book beomes boring or uninteresting, i pick a new one.
Leann- Wow. I can't even believe that you do not like Breaking Dawn very much. It is pretty much the best book ever! You will love the end i think, so keep reading.
Taylor- I kind of wanted to read that book but I am having second thoughts because you say it is really boring now.
Sam: I hate it when a book is slow paced. I want to keep reading, but it's really hard to stay focused when nothing seems to be happening.
Taylor: I remember when I read a book by Sarah Dessen, it had some parts that were like that too. I think that if you just keep going, you'll find that it gets better.
Stephanie: I think your book sounds kind of confusing, but maybe you should keep going. I hate it when i am reading a book in which I don't understand, but try to push through it and maybe it will get better.
Maria- I have the opposite problem. My main character is constantly changing. It is hard to keep up with him and it is sometimes very confusing.
Christie- My book is also very redundant and I hate when the author keeps repeating. The nice thing about my author is sometimes he uses different words to explain the sam situation. The words become more meaningful as the story continues.
Megan i know what you mean about not wanting to change anything in the book. SOmetimes i get books like that. Those type of books are the best.
Taylor- Your book sounds very interesting. Maybe you should just write a sequel to it. I hat eit when books have language that i can't understand.
Amanda- Books with a slow pace are very annoying. I am just way to excited to read and then the story is just so slow. My book is the same way. I wish it would move along a little faster
Sam- Your book sounds really good! It would be interesting to hear the side of the story from the person who died since you don't usually hear that side. I hate reading slow paced books though also, sometimes I don't give books a long enough chance to really get good if they're boring in the beginning.
Maria- I hope the next book comes otu soon for you. It's a shame when someone really gets involved in a series and they're waiting for the next one to come out, it can be really hard to wait. That's good that you're enjoying the book though.
Christie- I hate it when you want a charcter to be in a story or come back into the stroy. It really changes the whole book for you and alot of people just stop reading the book if they want a charcter back in the story that bad. It really sort of upsets me when that happens.
Amanda, Stephanie, and Sam: I also hate when a story moves at a slow pace. You just want them to get to the point. The book I'm reading is also moving at a slow pace. It starts to get very boring.
Emily: I am obsessed with the Sisterhood of the Traveling Pants books. I agree, I think Lena took Kostos back too easily. In the movie, she went on one date with Leo, and he was gorgeous! I guess they will just always be together.
Emily- I Love The Sisterhood of the Traveling Pants. It's so good! My favorite girl in the book was Lena. Shes my favorite because she so easy going and quiet until she goes to grece. Then everything changes and she gets a voice. But i undertand and totally agree with what youre saying.
Staphanie- I hate when books move at a slow pace. Its very irritating as the reader for the book to just drag onand on.
Hey, it's Greg! If I could change anything about "A Wrinkle in Time" I would probably change the dialogue. It sounds like a film from the 1960's, and is even a bit prosaic in some parts. The book is still enthralling, and it's as if the plot of the book extentuates on behalf of its redundant dialogue. It's still a very politic and intelligent novel!
Andrea- I would probably change the same thing about your book as well. It sounds like Lee could use a bit of self-esteem!
Mrs. Stallman (tara)- I know what you're talking about! I've read some short stories and novels in which there is a lot of history that is involved in the plot, but yet at the same time is not explained in the text itself. I had to go to an outside source to figure out the meanings of certain events. I think that the use of non-fictional history in fictional literature makes the impact of the work much more incisive.
Samantha:I will have to agree with LeAnn, Breaking Dawn is AMAZING, even if it is a little slow. I love all the amazing details and descriptions Samantha gives!
Lyndsey: Your Book sound cool! I agree with u though, hugs, not drugs! Drugs are definately not good for you.
It's Amanda C! Maria- Tough break. It really sucks that nothing happened. There's nothing worse than suspence for a long period of time. Hold on! It'll be out before you know it. And meanwhile I'll start the seris. Corrine: What book are you reading? What My Mother Doesn't know? Bronx Masquerade? Some of the books written in poems can be hard to fallow but they're amazing anyway.
Christie - I think you'll love that book once you get more into it. I adored it! It may seem a little cliche at parts, but I think it's cliche in a good way, if you know what I mean. It really ties everything together well at the end, and every piece means something. I love it. I'm glad you're enjoying it so far.
Andrea - That sounds like an interesting book. What is it called? I think I might be able to relate to a book like that.
Greg - I need to read that book again! It was a really long time ago since I first read it. I remember seeing the movie, but I don't remember if it was any good or not. Sometimes dialog like that actually holds my interest, sometimes it smothers it. So I'll have to see if I agree with you!
Amanda Lin: Slow moving books always tend to annoy me. Especially when you're reading a series and you're really into the story then the author slows the pace of the book way down.
Audrey: J.K Rowling is brilliant with writing the Harry Potter books so pay attention to details. She ties everything into a really complex plot which keeps you guessing but in the end of the series everything makes sense. She's coming out with a new book in December so you should read that after you're done with the Harry Potter series. I forget what it was about but it sounded interesting.
Wow. A lot of people have prosaic books this week. Also, can you guys say your book titles in your blogs? I'm just curious. Audrey- you get more details as the story and the series continues, don't worry. Chris- Your book sounds interesting. I might have to read it. Lea- were you reading Where the Red Fern Grows? (I love that book) LeAnn- I agree, the waiting for the arrival of the Vulturi made me really impatient and it became rather redundant and boring.
leann- I didn't like the book that much either, even with reading the ending. I wish she left out some of the details at the beinning and added a few in certain spots. I don't think she played out the voltry scene very wellat the end bt wrapped it up pretty nicely. amanda-I hate books that move slowly but hopfully some event happens soon in your book to pick up the pace. audry-I never really thought about Harry's parents before. Tht would be interesting to find out what their personalites were. You always get these second hand accounts that are biased but I wonder... I love the book and know it will go into more detail as you go along.
Haley- I know what you mean. I always compare the differences with books and their movies. Sometimes I like the movie better. Then other times I like the book better because it has much more detail.
LeAnn- I can't believe it disappointed you! I have heard that from some of my other friends saying that about it too. I haven't read them all yet, but I hope to soon! So I can share if I liked Breaking Dawn.
Haley: What book/movie are you talking about? It actually sounds interesting.
Emily: I am a HUGE fan for the sisterhood books and movies. They just seem so realistic and easy to relate to.
Yes I agree with Emily. Can everyone please write their titles to the books they are reading? It just makes it so much easier to read and respond back to.
43 comments:
If I were to make changes to the book I am reading, it would be the imlicit history involved; I would make it more explicit! I would possibly even include an introduction to the book that paraphrases the preeminent history that the author uses to entrall the reader. I will have to say, however, that the plethora of historical references has certainly instilled cupidity for more historical knowledge; I have spend redundant amounts of time enhancing my knowledge by reading scintillating accounts of the Jacobite Rebellions (events that I would otherwise know nothing about!) SO...I guess the author's intent was not so deleterious after all!
One thing i would change about my story is the slow pacing. The author is very detailed but most of the thigns she descibed are impicit to me and i don't need the redundent descrpitions. I also don't like uncle charles, it seems prosaic and i don't think he considereds other feelings. Like he got uo and moved half way around the world and took aurelia with him without even considering her perspective. I feel that he is being sactimonious about his mission trip, and when he presents aurelia is he is very ostentatious
If I had the opportunity to change my book, I would definately change it! I am still reading Lock and Key by Sarah Dessen. As of right now, I am beginning to loose interest in reading this because it is so prosaic. I wish I was experiencing cupidity so I could actually have the motivation to continue reading the novel. It's not nesecessarily boring, but there are definately places in the novel where the author could have made it a little more exciting. She tends to write in a sanctimonious style in this novel and it gets old fast. I would make the main character, Ruby, a little more scintillating and winsome so more action could happen in the story. If she would just gain these characteristics, she would have the ability to enthrall her peers and become more open in her everyday life.
If I could change my book, i would bring Macy's dad back to life. I would include an introduction or something that paraphrased the book. This way the author could enthrall you before even rading the book. I would also try to make the book less redundant. Some parts of the book are prosaic and do not get my interest. I would also make Macy's boyfriend more winsome and caring. All he cares about is his school work. I would give him cupidity so that he wants his own girlfriend. Over though, I like the book a lot and am enjoying it quite well!
Ok so my book is very slow moving. I would definantly change that. I would enhance the pace of the book ramatically. I have been reading for a while now and just realized my book changes points of view. Although my book is preeminent, I would still change it. The book is prosaic. I wish it was scintillating. The story should change more rapidly. The bus accident wasn't very deleterious. At the very beginnning it sounded a;most destructive. Myabe i just have to go farther into the book to figure out what really happenend. Wll that is about all I would change in my book. I don't think i'm far enough to really tell what to change yet.
If I could I would change the book I am reading a little. I would make the book so it is not as prosaic. Sometimes it is hard to understand because it is written in poems. Some of the poems are redundant. There are many things that are repeated and excess things I don't think I really need to know. I would also enhance the poems so that I would know who was writing them. I also would change all the paragon girls. Some of the poems create a caricature in my mind of what they look like. Although, they most likely don't look like the way I pictured them.
If I was going to make changes in my book the first change I would make is to enhance the reader's knowledge of the time the book took place. It is hard to sat when the events are occuring. Also I would change some of the paraphrasing. I think the author could go into better detail. The author never extenuates the beatings the dogs take so I think it could be less gruesome at times. I don't like that the author makes averyone out to be deletorious and mean. I think maybe one person could be nice to these dogs. The auhtor doesn't mske any of the characters very winsome, sometimes you can't even understand what the character is saying. I really like the theme of my book but i think it could be written more open.
If I had a chance to enhance my book I would start the book at an earlier place. I would give a little more detail as to how Harry's parents were killed. You could paraphrase parts of it but still give more detail to it. I would also make Harry’s parents seem more important. They really didn’t get into what kind of people they were so maybe I would give them more character. Are they preeminent characters or more prosaic characters? What I would also change was I would have written more on Harry’s relatives waking up to see him on the front step. They said very little about the morning they found him. If I was the author I might have written more redundantly on this part in the story. I think she could have made this part more detailed.
Amanda C
I would change a small bit in the book I'm reading but not a whole lot because then it would loose its effect. I would make the Emmy charictor less like a paragon. I would paraphrase some of the information surronded by the redundant words so it'd make more sence. I would also enhance the importance and the apperance of Emmy in the book. I think I would even make Otis less prosaic.
If I could make a change to the book I am reading, I would give Lee a higher self-esteem. She is constantly worried that people our judging her every move. She might not be winsome, she is actually quite prosaic. I really do not think anyone cares what she does. She is very redundant when it somes to her crush Cross, she is constantly trting to impress him. She is full of cupidity as well. She does not think that she can be popular because she is ugly and poor, so she ditches her best friend to room with a better looking girl. She sort of reminds me of Holden; her cynicism is her preeminent feature. She has an opinion on everyone.
If I could change my book, I would probably change how much the character Becky is in it. She isn't in it as much as she is in the movie. In the movie, Becky and Sara are contiguous throughout the entire thing. I would also change how deleterious Miss Minchin is. She is described as this horrible person, but hasn't done anything that terrible yet. I guess the book wants you to be implicit! Something I would have changed earlier in my book would have to be how ostentatious Sara was with her riches. In the movie, she was not like this at all. The girls all viewed her as a paragon and preeminent girl. There should be a redundant explanation of Sara's new life as well. Other than the few things just discussed, I am really enjoying this book. When I am done I will watcht eh movie to compare the many differences i have already found!
Lyndsey here.
I'm reading the book Dirty Liar. I like how vividly he describes many of the items and feelings. It's enthralling because of how much detail he puts into it. If I could change the book, I'd make him quit his deleterious behavior of doing drugs. I find the writing style very similar to a lot of stories I read on the internet, so it almost feels redundant because of that. The main character's very honest to himself and in a way others around him, though. There's nothing sanctimonious about him. His honesty definantly enhances the story.
Making my character care about his men and situation he is in is what i would do to my book. I think that would enhance my book much better. I would also give him cupidity for something other than his distant love for someone, it has actually gotten pretty annoying. His out of mind behaviour has proved deleterious to the men in his squad, although he seems implicit to his actions. I will keep an incisive eye to whether he will change, eversince im not far in the book.
I didn't have time to read The Book Theif during class today, so when I went home, I finished Forever in Blue, the fourth and final Traveling Pants book. Although I have read all these books many times before, I continue to have great cupidity to read them. I never find them to be prosaic snd they enthrall the reader with their details, wit, and emotional pull.
I guess I would change how easily Lena took Kostos back. They say that they are meant for each other and will never love anyone else, but I still think there could have been someone else out there for Lena. I feel like their love was implicit, and I think that at least, instead of changing that they got back together, the explanation of their situation could have been enhanced.
I am reading Lolita by: Vladimir Nabokov. If I were to change my book I would have not let Humbert have a relationship with Annabel. Ever since Annabel, winsome little girls or "nymphets" would enthrall Humbert's interest. The book is really well written but in the perspective of a mind who wished to be absolved for his cupidity for nymphets but cannot help to but to feel the way that he does. Humbert's character seems to be implicit that he is disturbed in some way but you still can't help reading what he has to say because it's so interesting yet controversial. I really like it so far.
If I could change anything about my book it would probably be making it a faster pace. I am reading Lovely Bones and it is about a girl in heaven who was murdered by a deleterious man. I like how the book is from the point of view of the girl in heaven named Susie. It is enthralling! It is definitely not a prosaic book. I also do not like how the author uses redundant details. It is nice that the story is descriptive, but it is pretty slow paced because of all the details she throws in. I am going to keep reading it though because my mom says it is a preeminent book.
I'm not that far into the book "The Party Room" right now but I would change some things about it. So far the book has been sort of cheesy and seems very overdone and redundant. It is such a common story that it makes it kind out prosaic. I'm really hoping that there ends up being something preeminent happening for a surprise. The only events that have occured so far is that the two main girls- Sam and Kirsten, are at the party room drinking, popping pills, gossipping, and dancing contiguously in large groups like at a club. Then at the end of the chapter Sam starts screaming for help that someone is hurting her but I don't know what happened yet. I'm sure that it is something very deleterious. I'll have to keep reading and see if this book is interesting enough to keep reading.
I really don't want to cange anything in my book. It's not redundant, the previous book is paraphrased at the beginning, and the characters are very winsome also. This book just gives me more Cupidity for the third book in the series. The main character Eragon has a lot of preemiment features also.
Even though I have not read far enough into my book to really know any characters, if I were to make and insicive change to the novel I would change the introduction. To me, the first chapter of the novel was prosaic. I would make the introduction captivate the readers more than it did. I would change the old dog leaving into something along the lines of the narrator and him becoming contiguous in some way, maybe by living with eachother. I would also make the descriptions of the dog and his effect on the narrator less redundant. I do believe the author wrote the beginning in this way to some how enhance the rest of the story, but I'll have to read on to know for sure.
As we all know, I'm not a huge fan of the plot of Breaking Dawn, and I think it would enhance the series if the book was written with different ideas. Plus, I think incorporating the Volturi again could have been a good thing, but so far the arrival seems to be too deleterious. Their law enforcement comes with no trial. All they need is a quick accusation or misunderstanding and the Volturi come storming in, killing mercilessly without a second thought? Seems awfully old fashioned for such an established group of vampires. I hate to say it, but the wait for their arrival is also starting to become redundant and prosaic. So, sorry everyone that I'm bashing the book again, but after the other three preeminent books, this one has really disappointed me.
If I were to make changes to the book I was reading I would change only a few details. The book is already scintillating and you can relly feel for the characters because they are winsome but the politics make some parts prosaic. The main character hardly developes and spends most of his time exchaging gossip. No major event happens in the book but more mysteries keep arrising making it even more suspenceful. The worst part though is the fact the sequal is not out yet. The series has enthralled me and I can't wait to read the ending! Some parts I would have to describe as redundant but overall the book Brisingr is excellant.
Sam: I'm having the same issue with pacing as you are in my book to. It seems that a lot of people think there book is moviing slowly
Amanda: My book is redundent to its really annoying hearing the same thig over and over again
Emily: I think you've talked about these books before. They sound like they are pretty good. Would you recommend them?
LeAnn: I would have to agree they do make the Volturi's arrival take forever. I think they could have made them come a little sooner.
Christa, when a book becomes redundant it begins to lose favor in my eyes. Hopefully you can break through into the story more to get better reading. Often times when a book beomes boring or uninteresting, i pick a new one.
Leann- Wow. I can't even believe that you do not like Breaking Dawn very much. It is pretty much the best book ever! You will love the end i think, so keep reading.
Taylor- I kind of wanted to read that book but I am having second thoughts because you say it is really boring now.
Brian- Is your book about a war or something?
Sam: I hate it when a book is slow paced. I want to keep reading, but it's really hard to stay focused when nothing seems to be happening.
Taylor: I remember when I read a book by Sarah Dessen, it had some parts that were like that too. I think that if you just keep going, you'll find that it gets better.
Stephanie: I think your book sounds kind of confusing, but maybe you should keep going. I hate it when i am reading a book in which I don't understand, but try to push through it and maybe it will get better.
Maria- I have the opposite problem. My main character is constantly changing. It is hard to keep up with him and it is sometimes very confusing.
Christie- My book is also very redundant and I hate when the author keeps repeating. The nice thing about my author is sometimes he uses different words to explain the sam situation. The words become more meaningful as the story continues.
Megan i know what you mean about not wanting to change anything in the book. SOmetimes i get books like that. Those type of books are the best.
Taylor- Your book sounds very interesting. Maybe you should just write a sequel to it. I hat eit when books have language that i can't understand.
Amanda- Books with a slow pace are very annoying. I am just way to excited to read and then the story is just so slow. My book is the same way. I wish it would move along a little faster
Sam- Your book sounds really good! It would be interesting to hear the side of the story from the person who died since you don't usually hear that side. I hate reading slow paced books though also, sometimes I don't give books a long enough chance to really get good if they're boring in the beginning.
Maria- I hope the next book comes otu soon for you. It's a shame when someone really gets involved in a series and they're waiting for the next one to come out, it can be really hard to wait. That's good that you're enjoying the book though.
Christie- I hate it when you want a charcter to be in a story or come back into the stroy. It really changes the whole book for you and alot of people just stop reading the book if they want a charcter back in the story that bad. It really sort of upsets me when that happens.
Crista- I hate when a book's too cheesy. I hope it makes a turn fro the better.
Emily- I agree with what you'd change. Kostos fails. The artist guy was much cooler!
Amanda, Stephanie, and Sam: I also hate when a story moves at a slow pace. You just want them to get to the point. The book I'm reading is also moving at a slow pace. It starts to get very boring.
Emily: I am obsessed with the Sisterhood of the Traveling Pants books. I agree, I think Lena took Kostos back too easily. In the movie, she went on one date with Leo, and he was gorgeous! I guess they will just always be together.
Emily- I Love The Sisterhood of the Traveling Pants. It's so good! My favorite girl in the book was Lena. Shes my favorite because she so easy going and quiet until she goes to grece. Then everything changes and she gets a voice. But i undertand and totally agree with what youre saying.
Staphanie- I hate when books move at a slow pace. Its very irritating as the reader for the book to just drag onand on.
Hey, it's Greg! If I could change anything about "A Wrinkle in Time" I would probably change the dialogue. It sounds like a film from the 1960's, and is even a bit prosaic in some parts. The book is still enthralling, and it's as if the plot of the book extentuates on behalf of its redundant dialogue. It's still a very politic and intelligent novel!
Andrea- I would probably change the same thing about your book as well. It sounds like Lee could use a bit of self-esteem!
Mrs. Stallman (tara)- I know what you're talking about! I've read some short stories and novels in which there is a lot of history that is involved in the plot, but yet at the same time is not explained in the text itself. I had to go to an outside source to figure out the meanings of certain events. I think that the use of non-fictional history in fictional literature makes the impact of the work much more incisive.
Samantha:I will have to agree with LeAnn, Breaking Dawn is AMAZING, even if it is a little slow. I love all the amazing details and descriptions Samantha gives!
Lyndsey: Your Book sound cool! I agree with u though, hugs, not drugs! Drugs are definately not good for you.
It's Amanda C!
Maria- Tough break. It really sucks that nothing happened. There's nothing worse than suspence for a long period of time. Hold on! It'll be out before you know it. And meanwhile I'll start the seris.
Corrine: What book are you reading? What My Mother Doesn't know? Bronx Masquerade? Some of the books written in poems can be hard to fallow but they're amazing anyway.
Christie - I think you'll love that book once you get more into it. I adored it! It may seem a little cliche at parts, but I think it's cliche in a good way, if you know what I mean. It really ties everything together well at the end, and every piece means something. I love it. I'm glad you're enjoying it so far.
Andrea - That sounds like an interesting book. What is it called? I think I might be able to relate to a book like that.
Greg - I need to read that book again! It was a really long time ago since I first read it. I remember seeing the movie, but I don't remember if it was any good or not. Sometimes dialog like that actually holds my interest, sometimes it smothers it. So I'll have to see if I agree with you!
Amanda Lin: Slow moving books always tend to annoy me. Especially when you're reading a series and you're really into the story then the author slows the pace of the book way down.
Audrey: J.K Rowling is brilliant with writing the Harry Potter books so pay attention to details. She ties everything into a really complex plot which keeps you guessing but in the end of the series everything makes sense. She's coming out with a new book in December so you should read that after you're done with the Harry Potter series. I forget what it was about but it sounded interesting.
Wow. A lot of people have prosaic books this week. Also, can you guys say your book titles in your blogs? I'm just curious.
Audrey- you get more details as the story and the series continues, don't worry.
Chris- Your book sounds interesting. I might have to read it.
Lea- were you reading Where the Red Fern Grows? (I love that book)
LeAnn- I agree, the waiting for the arrival of the Vulturi made me really impatient and it became rather redundant and boring.
leann- I didn't like the book that much either, even with reading the ending. I wish she left out some of the details at the beinning and added a few in certain spots. I don't think she played out the voltry scene very wellat the end bt wrapped it up pretty nicely.
amanda-I hate books that move slowly but hopfully some event happens soon in your book to pick up the pace.
audry-I never really thought about Harry's parents before. Tht would be interesting to find out what their personalites were. You always get these second hand accounts that are biased but I wonder... I love the book and know it will go into more detail as you go along.
Haley- I know what you mean. I always compare the differences with books and their movies. Sometimes I like the movie better. Then other times I like the book better because it has much more detail.
LeAnn- I can't believe it disappointed you! I have heard that from some of my other friends saying that about it too. I haven't read them all yet, but I hope to soon! So I can share if I liked Breaking Dawn.
Christie: I don't like books that are very redunant either. I like books with twists and changes every so often so that the plot stays interesting.
Greg: A book that is written in a dialog like that wouldn't keep my attention.
Haley: What book/movie are you talking about? It actually sounds interesting.
Emily: I am a HUGE fan for the sisterhood books and movies. They just seem so realistic and easy to relate to.
Yes I agree with Emily. Can everyone please write their titles to the books they are reading? It just makes it so much easier to read and respond back to.
Post a Comment